The plaintiff was working near a chemical still. Plaintiff was severely burned in the resulting fire.
The chemical still and boiler units were not equipped with explosion proof switches, nor were there adequate warnings that the particular chemicals used could explode.
About the Author: James Swartz
Mr. Swartz, our Managing and Principal Attorney at Swartz & Swartz P.C., is a nationally recognized and respected trial attorney as well as consumer advocate. His practice focuses on cases involving negligence, torts, products liability, medical malpractice, wrongful death, and other claims involving catastrophic injuries.
Keep Reading
Want more? Here are some other blog posts you might be interested in.
Electronic cigarettes (also known as e-cigarettes) have significantly grown in popularity in recent years. According to the Centers for Disease
According to premises liability laws, property owners and management have a responsibility to ensure the safety of anyone with a
If you’re one of many who rely on Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority buses to get from Point A to Point
