A former birth control pill user decided to switch to an IUD as a form of birth control after reading about potential dangers associated with the pill.


Her physician inserted an IUD and instructed her on its use. She experienced some bleeding and cramping after insertion. Two years later she developed more severe cramping and a non-specific vaginal infection. Her physician was unable to determine the cause of the infection. When the IUD was finally removed the surgeon found that the infection had spread to her fallopian tubes necessitating their removal. (Shortly afterwards the manufacturer of the IUD revealed that the IUD was known to cause non-specific vaginal infections which did not respond to conservative treatment.)[94]

About the Author: James Swartz
Mr. Swartz, our Managing and Principal Attorney at Swartz & Swartz P.C., is a nationally recognized and respected trial attorney as well as consumer advocate. His practice focuses on cases involving negligence, torts, products liability, medical malpractice, wrongful death, and other claims involving catastrophic injuries.

Keep Reading

Want more? Here are some other blog posts you might be interested in.